Teleconference: Philip Argy, Kitty Davis, Odette Gourley, Stuart Hamilton, Ian Johnston, Daniel Rechtman, Peter Reynolds, Leanne Schultz, Galen Townson
Apologies: Sandra Davey, Mark Davidson, Ian Halliday, Steve Pretzel, David Purdue, Tony Serong, Anthony Wyatt
Actions:
Decisions:
Draft Stage 2 report
1. The Chair and secretariat will revise
the draft Stage 2 report and circulate it to the Panel via the closed list
with a short deadline for comments. Following approval, the report will be
released for public consultation for a minimum of 21 days.
Public consultation process
2. The Chair and secretariat will
consider additional distribution mechanisms for the Stage 2 report, and add
identified organisations and individuals to the circulation list.
Next meeting
3. The next Panel meeting was scheduled for 28
November 2000, but will be deferred to 12 December 2000, in Sydney.
Discussion:
1 Confirmation of 26 September Minutes
Panel members confirmed
the minutes from the meeting on 26 September 2000, previously circulated via
the closed list.
2 Draft Stage 2 report
Panel members discussed the revised
draft Stage 2 report. The Panel thanked Ian Johnston for his paper outlining
alternative proposals regarding generic and geographic domain names.
A number of editorial suggestions were made, along with more substantive comments including:
Odette Gourley volunteered to provide some text on trade mark rights (including a definition for the glossary). Daniel Rechtman volunteered to provide some text on the need for domain name policies to be technically feasible and able to be applied consistently by all registrars.
3 Public consultation process
Panel members were advised that
the auDA Advisory Panel Procedures require an initial public consultation
period of 21 days minimum.
The Panel noted the proposed circulation list and suggested a number of additional organisations and individuals, including:
Panel members also agreed to circulate the report among their own constituencies.
In order to fully accommodate the public consultation period, it was agreed that the next Panel meeting will be deferred until 12 December.
4 Coordination with Competition Model Advisory Panel
Panel
members were advised that there will be a meeting in November involving the
three Panel chairs, four common Panel members and the secretariat, to
discuss areas of overlap and possible coordination mechanisms.